|[AMRadio] The AM Window|
bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Wed Dec 22 07:34:32 EST 2004
Well if they use "offensive language" it is guaranteed that they
will probably get the attention that they so desperately crave.
That is basically what it is down to, for these insignificant,
self-loathing babies that try so hard to offend others. They
are really just a little child inside an adult body, just hoping
that someone, somewhere will notice that they exist.
I'm glad most hams are not that psychotic. Yes, a few AM ops
in the northeast go off the deep end, but I always get a good laugh
out of them, even if they embarrass me. Most of it is really
good-natured and not intended to harm anyone else. The slop
bucket ops , on the other hand, can be an entirely different kettle
On 21 Dec 2004 at 21:53, Paul Sokoloff wrote:
> Hello gentlemen,
> I have been enjoying the conversation here and I agree with Geoff. As a
> relatively new AMer we need to find a hole and call CQ. The trick is that
> the rest of us have to tune the entire band looking for QSOs.
> I had an interesting experience a few Saturday evenings ago. There were
> NO QSOs in the AM window at 10pm. I called CQ for 30 minutes and got no
> response. What happened to everyone?
> There are a few AM folks here in the northeast who use somewhat
> offensive language on the air. It is really ashame and does give us a bad
> name. Anyway enjoy the bands while we have them. See you on the air.
> 73s, Paul WA3GFZ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Geoff/W5OMR" <w5omr at w5omr.shacknet.nu>
> To: "Discussion of AM Radio" <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 8:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The AM Window
> > > Quote - "...to have a one to one contact but if this were the case then
> > > 3880-3890 will only have 6 AM Stations on it at a time."
> > > You hit the nail on the head. So I guess, unless I want to break into a
> > > one-on-one discussion, even through I may have no interest in what the
> > > discussion is about, I should shut down the rig and go and do something
> > > else. Unfortunately, my perception of many "AM Windowers" is like timid
> > > sheep in a pen with no gate.
> > Nothing anywhere says you can not operate AM mode anywhere in the
> > phone band your license will allow you to operate.
> > There is no "Window", just a calling freq of 3.885. Same on 10m - the AM
> > calling frequency is 29.00. Just like 146.52, and 52.525Mc, those simplex
> > "calling frequencies" are just that, and as soon as you establish contact,
> > move off of the calling frequency (where*EVER* you can find a clear spot)
> > and move your conversation (phone)/QSO (CW) there. (CW is allowed
> > everywhere still, right? ;-))
> > So, if I call CQ on 3.885, and there's an AM conversation on 3.880 and
> > on 3.890, I'm gonna go hunt up/down and find a hole somewhere else that
> > this station and I can mutually work, together. I, being the Extra, would
> > the other party where he'd be comfortable at. 3.870? 3.875? 3.753.45?
> > I -have-
> > a VFO, so it don't matter.
> > Speaking of which... Not Having a VFO is no excuse, either. If you've a
> > crystal, you can feed a vfo signal in that same socket. Even if it's only
> > low-
> > level output from a ricebox, you can feed a small amount of RF in there,
> > make that old rig frequency agile.
> > I conlude that the general concession is that a lot of the "local
> > on
> > 75m is, well.. let's just say it's not fit for mixed company. Not that
> I'm a
> > prude,
> > but I also get that more gentlemen operate AM than there are Gentlemen on
> > most SSB frequencies. Being polite Gentlemen, and not being diliberate,
> > -not- fire up AM QSO's, starting at 3.753 (if the frequency is clear) and
> > a pair of guys every 6kc (when possible) and fill the whole cotton pickin'
> > with AM. THEN, when the Sidebanders whine and complain about ALL the
> > AM, we -could- say "Fine. We'll confine ourselves to these 30kc *if* you
> > keep your SSB QSO's off of say between 3.860 to 3.890." But, then that
> > us back in a "window" or a box, if you will. No.. upon further
> reflection, I
> > believe that operating an AM rig anywhere you're allowed phone operation
> > is what the answer is. Being limited to 3.870/75/80/85 and 90 on 75m
> is -not-
> > conducive to further growth of our little spectrum of the hobby.
> > If we want to 'raise the level of politeness' on 75m, then let's get
> AM'ers on
> > the band, starting from 3.753, and getting a qso going every 6kc up the
> > Getting everyone on, at the same time, is a logistical nightmare, but
> a -lot- of
> > people have a -lot- more free-time during the holiday season.
> > Any suggestions as to when this should happen?
> > 73 = Best Regards,
> > -Geoff/W5OMR
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > AMRadio mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 15 Dec 2017.