[AMRadio] Send your Comment to the FCC about BPL |
Peter Markavage
manualman at juno.com
Wed Jun 16 14:56:57 EDT 2004
Why would this be important to the FCC? >> "destroying many people's life
hobby" To them, it's referred to as the amateur radio service.
However, maybe something like >>...threatening the future existence of
the amateur radio service and the important voluntary communications work
amateurs have participated in times of disasters...
Pete, wa2cwa
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 08:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Mark Foltarz
<Foltarz at rocketmail.com> writes:
> Here we go...
>
> 1 . goto http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi
>
> 2. In box 1 enter 04-037
>
> 3. Fill in your name address etc.
>
> 4. Enter you thoughts on BPL in the comments section (Send a Brief
> Comment to
> FCC (typed-in) ) perhaps something like :
>
> In Writing, I wish to persuade the FCC from allowing BPL to be
> implemented. The destruction or at the least, deterioration of the
> shortwave bands is not only a violation of ITU laws that protect
> international broadcasters from interference and jamming, it will
> be
> . Amateur radio will be reduced
> to
> users with high-power amplifiers and large antennas. Emergency
> communications will be hindered to levels directly responsible for
> the
> loss of life. Also, this will hinder military HF comms reducing
> national
> security
>
> There are many technologies that make BPL unnecessary. BPL will
> never be
> able to carry the high bandwidth demands for mass distribution of
> video
> much less the up-and-coming HDTV.
>
> Thank You!
>
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
More information about the AMRadio
mailing list
This page last updated 19 Mar 2024.