|[AMRadio] Re: KD5OEI|
bmaser at tampabay.rr.com
Tue Aug 16 21:41:17 EDT 2005
My, aren't we touchy. Actually, I was more interested in telling you that
your message had a virus attached to it than giving you a hard time about
your technician license. Maybe now that it looks like CW will be dropped
from amateur requirements, we'll see more of you guys down on the bands
where AM is still practiced.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Jankowiak" <recycler at swbell.net>
To: <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:20 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] Re: KD5OEI
> Hey Geoff, I didn't take anything the wrong way, or from Bob's post with
> the good buddy either (although I did feel compelled to reply to that
> one!). No skin off my nose, all is good.
> I gotta fix up them rigs.. soon soon.. at least they are un-buried.
>> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:24:04 -0500
>> From: Geoff <w5omr at satx.rr.com>
>> Subject: [AMRadio] KD5OEI
>> To: Discussion of AM Radio <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
>> Message-ID: <43027594.3080605 at satx.rr.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>> It's come to my attention that I may have shed some negative light on a
>> fellow enthusiast, Patrick Jankowiak/KD5OEI.
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 23 Oct 2017.