|[AMRadio] AM Exemption Already Drawing Fire|
manualman at juno.com
Mon Dec 5 02:17:06 EST 2005
I applaud those 3 for even trying to bring a point into a den of
discussion that mainly comprises personal agenda and typical ARRL
bashing. I think I'll sit back and see what the FCC's action is on this
proposal and the one that was already submitted in June. The FCC has
already indicated that the present Part 97 rules lack clarity and, in
some cases, impede the operation of new modes on our amateur bands. If
nothing else, I'm sure over the next several years, we'll see changes
made to various sections of Part 97 governing our amateur service. The
dabble on QRZ just adds to the amusement.
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:21:15 -0500 "Brian Carling" <bcarling at cfl.rr.com>
> On 4 Dec 2005 at 21:15, peter markavage wrote:
> > These "rejectors" of the proposal account for less than
> > .1% of the ham population
> Yes and the proponents in that discussion (3, I think) comprise
> 0.000006% of the USA amateur population.
> The nays have it. The burden of proof is on anyone who wants this
> turkey of a proposal left over from Thanksgiving (grin!)
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 11 Dec 2017.