|[AMRadio] AM Exemption Already Drawing Fire|
w5omr at satx.rr.com
Mon Dec 5 21:32:06 EST 2005
David McClafferty wrote:
>--- W5OMR/Geoff <w5omr at satx.rr.com> wrote:
>>Wouldn't it be a horrible thing if we wind up like
>>Canada is, now, where
>>we can only run FCC type-accepted equipment?
>Why would we run FCC type accepted equipment? The FCC
>has no authority in Canada.
>Canadian hams who have their Advanced license can
>build their own transmitting equipment. Lower classes
>can only use commercially built transmitting equipment
>but that now also includes commercially made kits.
Forgive my 'arrogant American' way of thinking.. It's just word
association. 'FCC type accepted' is a common phrase.
Down here, regardless of license class, American hams do -not- have the
restriction of using only Commercially built transmitting equipment. I
thank those fore-fathers who wisely kept that decision, as the spirit of
that statement is intended to foster the experimenter in us like-minded
I can see where the incentive is, as far as the Canadian version of the
FCC is concerned - upgrade your license class, so you can build your
own. At the same time, I can see where it would stifle the imagination,
and further segregate hams within their own fraternity.
I think I'd prefer to have things the way they are, here in America -
anyone who becomes a Licensed Ham Radio Operator should be able to
build, test and operate their own home-brewed equipment.
73 = Best Regards,
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 18 Oct 2017.