[AMRadio] ARRL bandwidth scheme not accepted


peter markavage manualman at juno.com
Thu Dec 8 13:27:24 EST 2005


Acceptance question:
Has the FCC provided an RM number to the sweeping amateur radio proposal
your CTT group submitted in June05 that would have major ramifications to
the amateur radio service? Do you ever plan to amend your proposal to
include the omissions in the license class tables where some license
classes actually lose privileges?
And where is this "blank" that you refer to (URL?) and why is this not a
good thing?

Pete, wa2cwa

On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:30:25 -0800 (PST) VJB <wa3vjb at yahoo.com> writes:
> 
> Patrick,
> 
> There's no RM number because the FCC has not accepted
> the League's Petition.
> 
> It's an old tactic for a petitioner to provide a blank
> like the group in Newington has done, just to make it
> nice and easy for the agency to fill in the blank.
> 
> Nice try.
> 
> Paul/VJB



More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 20 Oct 2017.