[AMRadio] cooking Baxter's goose


kenw2dtc kenw2dtc at comcast.net
Mon Jun 20 14:13:33 EDT 2005


Hi Bacon,
The frequency choice is one thing but the fact that Baxter didn't consider 
an AM bulletin before talking to Tim is, to me, the more important thing. 
Hopefully this Baxter thing will conclude by the end of the year.
73,
Ken W2DTC

--------------------------


> Hi Ken,
>
> Hmm, that's not how I understood what Tim told me.  But maybe Glenn
> remembers it accurately.
>
>  Bacon, WA3WDR
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc at comcast.net>
> To: "Discussion of AM Radio" <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 1:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] cooking Baxter's goose
>
>
>>
>>  Bacon, WA3WDR said:
>>
>> "This was a compromise.  The move was to 3890, as opposed to the original
>> 3885.  The idea was QSOs could slide toward 3880 during Glenn's
> broadcast."
>>
>> Listen to this sound bite and you will hear that there was no compromise
> at
>> all:
>>
>> http://w2dtc.com/sound-bites.htm
>>
>> 73,
>> Ken W2DTC
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> AMRadio mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net 




More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 14 Dec 2017.