|[AMRadio] B&W 5100, 5100b differences?|
Thermionic_Emission at earthlink.net
Mon Mar 14 12:40:12 EST 2005
Mark, When you say couplate, is that the 2 extra caps in the coupling
circuit? Thanks, George kb2z
At 11:39 AM 3/14/05 -0500, you wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jim Wilhite" <w5jo at brightok.net>
>To: "Discussion of AM Radio" <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:59 AM
>Subject: Re: [AMRadio] B&W 5100, 5100b differences?
> > I can't tell you much but some of the differences are, the 5100B was
> > designed to provide phasing SSB with the addition of the 51SB-B,which
> > derived it power from the 5100B. The 51SB had a power supply built in and
> > required some modifications to the 5100 to make it work. The 5100B has a
> > switch that provided neutralization to the final plus switched the RF from
> > the mixer section to the SSB exciter, the 5100 did not have that switch.
> > The 5100 was designed for AM and CW work only.
>The original 5100's were designed for AM and CW work only, but later 5100's
>were "kinda" designed for SSB work. I call the later models of the 5100 the
>"S" variant, as they had the AM/SSB switch factory installed inside the
>radio -- you had to lift the lid to change the switch, as it was localted to
>the left and behind the finals. You could also purchase an after market
>kit from B&W to add this switch to the non "S" 5100s. You needed the switch
>installed (one way or the other) to use the 51SB. Along with the switch
>kit came an addendum that had you change several components. I have the
>addendum sheet and the kit instructions somehwere in the shack. I'm
>wondering if the addendum sheet had any changes in the audio circuit to
>limit the audio for the 51SB-B. I'll have to dig it out and check.
> > The changes you noticed in the modulator/audio section were performed to
> > limit the passband of the audio on AM which also benefited SSB. You will
> > note that a cathode resistor was switched in for AM whereas the 5100 had
> > that resistor there permanently. There was also a couplate that
> > the audio between the second stage audio and audio driver to the
> > Another resistor and a cap to ground was added to help this limiting as
> > to the grids of the modulator tubes.
>I've wondered about removing the couplate and just replacing it with a
>different network that doesn't restrict the audio quite as much. I get good
>audio reports with my stock 5100B, so I've never had any real inclination to
>do the change, but it's crossed my mind from time to time.
> > Other than that, I don't see much difference. I just obtained a 5100 that
> > will pick up this Friday so will be able to look more closely, but the
> > comment by Robert is intriguing. The modulation transformer in the 5100B
> > does look to be a little light for it's duty.
>I've got a 5100B/51SB-B on the air, and a non "S" 5100 on the shelf. The
>5100 works, but needs cleaned, filter caps changed etc. I pick up my "S"
>variant 5100 just before Easter. It's grungy, and will require the typical
>cleaning and parts replacement. I plan to use this with the 51SB that's
>lonely on my shelf.
>The last time I chatted with Mo W5KD (SK), he gave me the power supply mods
>he made to his 5100 to beef it up. Mo also did some audio mods to his
>5100, and if you've ever talked to Mo on the air, he had one very sweet
>sounding 5100. My non "S" 5100 has a 32V2 mod tranny in it, but I've
>since acquired a replacement tranny. Anyway, because of that, he didn't
>bother giving me the audio mods. Anyone know what they were?
>73 Mark K3MSB
> > 73 Jim
> > W5JO
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "George KB2Z" <Thermionic_Emission at earthlink.net>
> > To: "amradio-mailman.qth.net" <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
> > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 8:30 AM
> > Subject: [AMRadio] B&W 5100, 5100b differences?
> > > Morning all,
> > > Could anyone on the list tell me the performance differences between the
> > > B&W 5100 and 5100B?
> > > On the schematics the changes in the audio/modulator section jump out.
> > > one better than the other? Any thoughts or opinions would be
> > > Thanks in advance, George KB2Z
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > AMRadio mailing list
> > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> > >
> > >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > AMRadio mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>AMRadio mailing list
>Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 266.7.1 - Release Date: 3/9/05
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 21 Oct 2017.