|[AMRadio] Re: Screen Modulated 813|
brett.gazdzinski at verizonbusiness.com
Tue Dec 12 19:13:22 EST 2006
No one talks about the nasty distortion you get in most
receivers when you get much over 100% modulation.
Most people sound MUCH nicer if they run the audio
under 100% modulation.
My transmitter might like doing 15 watts of carrier
and 1500 watts pep, but no one is going to think it
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of ne1s
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2:55 PM
> To: bcarling at cfl.rr.com; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
> Subject: [AMRadio] Re: Screen Modulated 813
> Bry Carling writes:
> > Lary - I was talking about the kind of set-up with the 6DE7
> > that produces a SMALL carrier of say 6 or 8 watts
> > and then does 90 watts p.e.p. on the voice peaks.
> Right - that is the question I addressed.
> > I may be nuts, but my empirical sense tells me that is
> > far more impressive sounding in the receiver n the other
> > end than the signal from the typical "novice rig" that runs
> > 75 watts carrier input with Heising mod. OR even a plate
> > modulated class C rig with 22.5 watts carrier input and
> > 90 watts p.e.p.
> I think by "impressive" you mean the ratio of power in the
> sidebands to
> unmodulated carrier power - if so, I'd agree.
> > The power is turned DOWN during the inefficient phase
> > of the transmission in other words.
> We need to be careful here, because this created a
> misunderstanding about a
> year ago. With efficiency modulation (be it a linear
> amplifier stage, or
> screen suppressor, or control-grid modulated amplifier) PLATE
> EFFICIENCY (RF
> power output/DC plate power input) is lowest when the
> instantateous output
> is lowest. Therefore, the lower the output of the unmodulated
> carrier, the
> lower the PLATE EFFICIENCY. If we think of efficiency in
> terms of power in
> the sidebands/total power consumed (integrated over time),
> your statement is
> > WIth less and less quiescent signal the transmitter appraoches
> > the efficiency level of a DSB rig.
> Yes - in the limit, as the carrier level is reduced to zero,
> that's exactly
> what your left with: DSB w/o carrier. But the above comments
> on efficency
> still hold - plate efficiency in this case will be zero when
> no modulation
> is present, because there is no RF output, with finite DC plate power
> consumed. But, integrated over time, I believe less power
> will be consumed
> to convey the intelligence, so in this sense, "efficiency" is better.
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 17 Oct 2017.