|[AMRadio] FCC and AM on the BC band|
jcandela at prodigy.net
Wed Feb 8 10:07:04 EST 2006
I guess it was me that brought up the KOKE AM 1600
issue with voice over IP, quality, dead air, etc. I
however did not mention anything about programming
content. Somebody else did that.
It has been a good long while since I worked in a
AM station as a broadcast engineer (1st FCC licensee
here), but I always recall striving for broadcasting
excellence regardless of content. On more than one
occasion I was under that mixer board looking for a
source of an intermittant, or 60 hz hum source when
the disk jockey was saying things that I did not agree
with, or was playing music that made me want to vomit.
Still, I set the board to achieve full modulation,
with crystal clear audio. It was in that spirit I
brought up KOKE AM 1600 in Austin since this station
stands out in a way that it is unlistenable due to
dead air, cut-outs (voip), over modulation, etc.
--- Ken Zuercher <hepcatrevival at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sorry I just got around to reading this for a reply.
> The prime cause of wierdness in programming and
> quality is that there is rarely anyone minding the
> store at Commercial stations, especially AM. The
> stations are being run by computers, Usually windows
> machines that are riddled with bugs. The engineers
> like me, a contractor that isn't on staff and only
> called in ocassionally. Thing happen to the systems
> and you get dead air, multiple sources on the
> I also think that political commentary doesn't
> on this or any other ham radio list. Considering
> 90% of the AM talkers are of the right wing variety,
> comments about Air America should be best kept to
> self. Not all of us think alike and that's a very
> thing. If we did, we all would have only rice box
> Ken KC8QO
> --- VJB <wa3vjb at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > The FCC is allowing the quality of AM signals to
> > deteriorate, but it's been over a very long period
> > of
> > time.
> > First there was the neglect of receiver standards
> > which could have forced car radio and home tuner
> > manufactuers to comply with minimum specs on
> > selectivity and audio fidelity. Many industry
> > observers feel this could have been established
> > during
> > the "AM Stereo" controversy.
> > Then, after failing to do that, the FCC allowed
> > industry to propose and implement a 9 kHz
> > transmitted
> > bandwidth standard, ostensibly to minimize
> > channel interference.
> > In the time since digital decoding and encoding
> > became
> > a successor to the (sometimes) equalized metallic
> > pair
> > between studio and transmitter, there has not been
> > enough industry interest at making sure digital
> > artifacts are held to a minimum
> > Lately, the industry jumped on the "digital"
> > bandwagon
> > that rolled through television then FM, to
> > voluntarily
> > try to implement In-Band, On-Channel digital
> > on contemporary AM frequencies.
> > The side effects of this system spread
> > well past 15 to 20 Kc from center frequency, as a
> > function of trying to match (not beat) the kind of
> > analog audio quality our parents remember when
> > were tuned to AM on the old wooden floor console
> > that
> > served as the Home Entertainment Center in those
> > pre-TV days.
> > Paul/VJB
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > AMRadio mailing list
> > Home:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> > AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
> > AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul
> > Courson/wa3vjb
> AMRadio mailing list
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 21 Oct 2017.