|[AMRadio] League Bandwidth petition - final tally|
uvc1 at verizon.net
Thu Feb 23 09:22:11 EST 2006
we need to work through this there is some dangerous language in the ARRL's
From: amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of VJB
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 5:09 AM
To: amradio at mailman.qth.net
Subject: [AMRadio] League Bandwidth petition - final tally
As I've done on a variety of reflectors, I want to
drop a note on here to thank those on the AM Reflector
who took the time to send Comments for inclusion in
the FCC database.
As a result, the response to the League scheme to
abandon mode-based HF coordination can clearly be
called "overwhelmingly negative." Several people
making a tally found those opposed anywhere between
6:1 to 8:1, depending on how one interprets postings
that saw a shred of hope.
The League's Reply Comment to these concerns is at
(700K file size, Adobe PDF file type)
The FCC will take and consider the Comments and
eventually issue either a Report and Order rejecting
the petition, or a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that
may take suggestions from Commenters and try to
salvage accomplishing the stated goals.
Don't look for action anytime before the end of the
year, according an FCC official who is in a position
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
AMRadio mailing list
Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 17 Oct 2017.