|[AMRadio] a little refresher guide in email nettiquette |
Jose HF Silva
zehelmer at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 11 01:19:07 EST 2006
Thank you for your care and pedagogy but you are wrong
about the way it happened: when I saw it, your
ammendment was not yet there and I thought it could be
a very well known reference to most of members and it
would not be mentioned if not asked for.
And I would like to read it!
And the question was solved.
In my opinion, what you added is very well know to
most of members but one is somewhat free to still have
a style of his own.
Now, let's thank Jim Wilhite too for his fellowship!
And to close it, some bandwidth will not be too
excessive, in my opinion, when it concerns to main
subject here: good AM ;-))
Vy 73 de Jose' - CT1AXG
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:45:35 -0600
From: W5OMR/Geoff <w5omr at satx.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM modulation
To: Discussion of AM Radio <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Message-ID: <43C3580F.9070006 at satx.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
Jim Wilhite wrote:
> Look here:
I imagine he was just catching up, and reading the
list-mail, and saw
the one message where I forgot to inclue the URL
(which was immediatly
done in the -next- message).
A Lot of times, someone will ask the whole of the
group a question.
Instead of jumping in on -that- particular message,
I'll read through
the list, -first- to make sure it hasn't already been
someone elses point of view has been given (if that's
requires) and one that is similar to mine has been
brought to light,
then there'd be no need for me to chime and and say
too-, unless my whole intent and purpose was to take
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 13 Dec 2017.