[AMRadio] recent comments on AM


Brian Carling bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Sun Jan 15 20:22:16 EST 2006


Do you REALLY think they took any notice of those e-mails?

The proposal was set in stone long before that.

On 13 Jan 2006 at 19:40, peter markavage wrote:

> I'll dance with him Mark.
> 
> 
> I saw several ways that polling was requested:
> August 10, 2004:
> http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html
> And last paragraph in this URL:
> Please read the synopsis of the petition, below, as well as the exact
> rules changes that will be proposed. If you have any questions or
> comments, please direct them to bandwidth at arrl.org. ARRL staff will do
> its best to answer your questions. Comments will be forwarded to your
> ARRL division director. Members are also welcome, as always, to comment
> directly to their own director using the email address listed on page 15
> of any recent issue of QST. 
> 
> August 27, 2004
> ARRL Letter:
> http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/04/0827/
> ARRL Seeks Comment on Draft "Bandwidth" Petition
> 
> See the last paragraph.
> 
> I can probably quote a number of instances in QST Mag. from that time on
> where comments were requested.
> 
> My own Director, through our Division Monthly Newsletter, also requested
> input and comments to the proposal several times. 
> 
> Pete, wa2cwa
> 
> 
> > > From: Brian Carling [mailto:bcarling at cfl.rr.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 5:35 PM
> > > To: Discussion of AM Radio
> > > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] recent comments on AM
> > >
> > >
> > > No, you let us know how they did such a great job of polling 
> > radio
> > > amateurs instead of side stepping and claiming that they did...
> > >
> > > Where's the beef?
> > >
> > > On 13 Jan 2006 at 15:15, peter markavage wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the English lesson. Let me know when you have more 
> > to
> > > > contribute to my grammar.
> > > > Pete, wa2cwa
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:05:13 -0500 "Brian Carling" 
> > <bcarling at cfl.rr.com>
> > > > writes:
> > > > > On 13 Jan 2006 at 14:46, peter markavage wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > ARRL "request for comments to the draft proposal" is fully
> > > > > documented.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fully?
> > > > >
> > > > > As compared to what? Half-documented?
> > > > > How do you partially document something?
> ______________________________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb
> 





More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 11 Dec 2017.