[AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11305

bud chiller b_chill_98 at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 16 14:22:11 EST 2006

Hi Brain,
De Bud... WD8BIL.

One point to consider amongst all the "free for all,
chicken little sky falling fantacies" is simply this.

Any action the FCC takes in regards to 11305 will be
limited by the IARU Plans for Region 2. These plans
have all the safeguards against the W8JI doom n' gloom
scenerios. ex: His 7015 AM buddies trashing
7000-7030Khz; simply could not happen. IARU does not
allow phone emissions below 7050Khz in region 2!

So in the end, all our prposal CAN DO is limited by
the IARU Bandplan for Region 2. Simple as that.



--- Brian Carling <bcarling at cfl.rr.com> wrote:

> On 15 Jan 2006 at 12:59, Phil Galasso wrote:
> > > This over-regulation holds true for a lot of
> other realms in the U.S.
> > laws,
> > > but I digress. The problem is that we are so
> accustomed to being
> > > incentivized, and over-regulated that we do not
> have good self-discipline
> > > on the bands.
> > What an insulting, condescending attitude toward
> your fellow Americans!
> > Canada once had similar, although somewhat more
> liberal, subband
> > restrictions. They lifted them a few years ago and
> guess what...NO
> > CHAOS!
> Please don't make unlucky guesses about my so-called
> attitude.
> I agree with you. We COULD pull this off just fine.
> I am only saying that we HAVEN'T because the
> ridiculous 
> circumstances that YOU are bewailing have been
> foisted upon us.
> Please try to understand a little better next time. 
> I am starting to think that the system you propose
> would be better 
> than the Arrl Bandwidth plan if we must have change.
> I even offered to put a web page espousing the
> viewpoint, and yet 
> you seem to think I have an attitude to the
> contrary.
> Please read more carefully!
> We have three choices as I see it and none of them
> is ideal:
> RM-11305 - a free for all and hope we can behave.
> RM-11306 - the ARRL idiocy
> RM-00000 = Leave things alone.
> I think I probably now prefer RM-11305 over
> RM-11306.
> But RM-00000 would be OK too so long as ALL THREE
> of these get a clause that includes allowing AM and
> CW forever,
> AND a clause to rescind the stupid rule allowing
> unattended
> QRM generators to run roughshod over everything
> else.
> We can create enough of our own mode wars with 
> Canadians pumping slop bucket QRM
>  into the 40m CW sub-band, and turf wars on 75m
> phone!
> It's going to be interesting to see how all of this
> tug-o-war plays 
> out between the various groups that have their
> conflicting
> ideas set in stone.
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul
> Courson/wa3vjb

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 21 Feb 2018.