|[AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306|
bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Tue Jan 17 08:35:15 EST 2006
Again I agree 100%
I think we should give up 3600 to 3650 for the digital pests and let
the rest go to phone above (all license calsses permitted)
and CW below exclusively below 3600.
That will never happen of course, thanks to RTTY and digital
On 16 Jan 2006 at 23:44, W1EOF wrote:
> Jim -
> I am a CW op about 99% of the time. Yet I have to be honest and say I agree
> with you on 80M. Other than during a contest, we can give up some space to
> phone operation. I'd say to be fair a starting point would be 3700. Maybe
> 3650. However I disagree on 40M and 20M, especially 40M. Almost every night
> that little sliver of usable band is filled with CW signals. If you are not
> an Extra, as a CW op your version of 40M is 7026 - 7046 most night. 20kc.
> Not a heck of lot of room ro stretch out at all. I'd love to be able to get
> that @*&^$@* broadcast out of 40M. Holy moly if we had that whole band
> unmolested it would be a GREAT place to play.
> Just my feelings as a CW op.
> Mark W1EOF
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Wilhite [mailto:w5jo at brightok.net]
> > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 10:21 PM
> > To: Discussion of AM Radio
> > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306
> > hope, but the
> > fact remains, more space is needed for phone operation and the
> > lower half of
> > 80, 40,and 20 are under utilized.
> > 73 Jim
> > W5JO
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.18/230 - Release Date: 1/14/06
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 18 Oct 2017.