|[AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306|
John Coleman ARS WA5BXO
wa5bxo2005 at pctechref.com
Tue Jan 17 09:28:15 EST 2006
Also Jim, you may not need a BFO for CW in the phone band, HIHI.
From: amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of W1EOF
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 10:44 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306
I am a CW op about 99% of the time. Yet I have to be honest and say I
with you on 80M. Other than during a contest, we can give up some space
phone operation. I'd say to be fair a starting point would be 3700.
3650. However I disagree on 40M and 20M, especially 40M. Almost every
that little sliver of usable band is filled with CW signals. If you are
an Extra, as a CW op your version of 40M is 7026 - 7046 most night.
Not a heck of lot of room ro stretch out at all. I'd love to be able to
that @*&^$@* broadcast out of 40M. Holy moly if we had that whole band
unmolested it would be a GREAT place to play.
Just my feelings as a CW op.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Wilhite [mailto:w5jo at brightok.net]
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 10:21 PM
> To: Discussion of AM Radio
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306
> hope, but the
> fact remains, more space is needed for phone operation and the
> lower half of
> 80, 40,and 20 are under utilized.
> 73 Jim
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.18/230 - Release Date: 1/14/06
AMRadio mailing list
Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 25 Feb 2018.