|[AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306|
w5jo at brightok.net
Tue Jan 17 21:31:48 EST 2006
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer at comcast.net>
To: "'Discussion of AM Radio'" <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:08 PM
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306
> Many were confused about what PEP really was, including the manufacturers
> you look at some of the old spec sheets on SSB gear.
> Gary K4FMX
Gary, aren't a lot of people still confused about PEP? Listening to some
conversations and reading some reflectors lead me to believe so. Sometimes
I think it is right up there with SWRS.
How many realize the duty cycle of the human voice is only about 1/3?
Unless of course as you stated, there is a lot of AVC, or is that AGC, or
maybe processing. Hummmm whole new argument.
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 11 Dec 2017.