|[AMRadio] 6BG6 ad|
w5omr at satx.rr.com
Wed Mar 1 08:04:46 EST 2006
Jim candela wrote:
>Hmmm, Well it seems like the ads claim is true, verified by Mahlon, K4OQ. In
>that case I reiterate, this is "one heck of a deal". Try pricing the 6L6GC
>from any source NOS or new, and compare. How many AM rigs use the 6L6 as
>Johnson Ranger (is this correct?)
>How many others?
Yogie/KC5MIP had a Temco that used (4) 6L6's in the Modulator stage. I want to say it had a pair of 807's in the final, but I don't remember, exactly.
Ronnie/K5WLT built a modulator for his Knight Kit T-50, just after he
graduated up from being a Johnny Novice, to General. That's an
interesting modulator, in that it uses a pair of 6L6's and was built
from a Popular Elextronics magazine article, from back in the
mid-to-late 50's. One of those 6L6's is apparently slightly
microphonic. He can take the plastic handle of a screwdriver, hit the
metal 6L6 and the tube 'rings' like a bell. Ronnie has had so much fun
with that rig, running a single 807, modulated by a pair of 6L6's... and
has worked all over the country with it.
I, myself, have plugged in 6L6's into the Ranger, and Rager II I had,
back before I got the titanic.
I've got an old audio amp here, that I got from John/W5MEU that runs
either a pair, or 4, in p-p paralell.
6L6's are populare everywhere. And, while the engineers mght have
decided to use either 1614's in the Rangers, or 7027's in the Ranger
II's, I couldn't tell a nickles worth of difference in the rigs that I
had, between those tubes, and the 6L6.
Just my .02c.
Do I get change? ;-)
73 = Best Regards,
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 10 Dec 2017.