|[AMRadio] Re: AM BANDWARMING|
rwpeters at swbell.net
Wed Nov 22 15:54:05 EST 2006
I just checked my Antenna and tuning on 3.645 and matches a okkk am
awaiting the 15th now...
From: amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Todd, KA1KAQ
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 2:45 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM BANDWARMING
On 11/22/06, Donald Chester <k4kyv at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I suspect some readers may have misinterpreted this thread, so let's
> clarify the issue.
> The idea is to occupy several frequencies throughout the new
> allocations, and for each station to hop between these QSO's, so that
> the entire AM presence on the new frequencies doesn't end up on one
> frequency in one huge roundtable. Better to keep each group limited
> in size to 3 or 4 participants at most, and for each participant to
> shuffle from one AM group to another throughout the early morning and
> evening of the 15th.
Good luck there, Don! I've been trying to get that to happen for a while
now, instead the 'Clump Factor' results. And if I or others leave a
conversation to start up another one, often the other conversation ends
up on that frequency.
I'll be there, regardless of whether I've upgrade to Extra or not.
Here's hoping enough participants show up to make this idea work. If
nothing else, 3-4 people calling CQ on different frequencies should
offer some respectable AM beacons for others to home in on. Other than
the few bad nights we've had recently, I've heard a lot of activity on
75 as well as 160.
~ Todd, KA1KAQ
AMRadio mailing list
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 16 Dec 2017.