|[AMRadio] 75 Meters Long Already|
ars.ka5mir at gmail.com
Mon Nov 27 12:23:48 EST 2006
Yeah, the sunspot cycle seems the obvious culprit, but I don't remember it
being so bad in 86 when I traded my 520 for a fancy new TS-440, or the
Maybe I'm trying not to remember the bad parts. The band conditions, I
mean, not the getting a SSB rig. :)
On Monday 27 November 2006 09:31, Jim Wilhite wrote:
> I remember (don't all of us old folks) about 20 years ago
> when the skip on 75 was much like the current one. Nothing
> between 100 to 600 miles or very weak and stations out
> beyond that were strong as garlic breath.
> This is really not that uncommon. It follows the 11 year
> cycle and the 22 year cycle as does the upper bands. With
> few sunspots to upset the atmosphere that giant mirror in
> the sky is really working. What puzzles me more than 75 is
> 160. It is not near as good as I expected.
> >> For the last few months, we've lost the choice of short
> >> skip on 75
> >> at night.
> >> 160 is difficult for a lot of folks, antenna wise. So...
> >> No more
> >> talking
> >> to your buddies within a couple hundred miles late in the
> >> evening or
> >> night.
> >> 73',
> >> KA5MIR
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 21 Oct 2017.