[AMRadio] 6L6 or 1614


Mike Dorworth, K4XM k4xm at arczip.com
Fri Oct 27 15:56:34 EDT 2006


Let me add that a 6L6GC is rated at higher voltage and I suppose the 5881
military 6L6 is rated for more volts and would make a dandy substitue for
the 1614.. 73 Mike


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "uvcm inc." <uvc1 at verizon.net>
To: "'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'"
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 3:37 PM
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] 6L6 or 1614


>
>
> Both will work in a Johnson Ranger and no doubt the 1614 is the better
> choice, but does anyone have facts as to the feasibility of using the
> 6L6?  I personally think the 6L6 works fine, but doesn't last long in
> comparison.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Rick/K5IZ
>
> Try 6550 or KT88 used them for over 20 years never damaged or harmed any
> component on a ranger 1
> Brad Kb7fqr
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>
>




More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 15 Dec 2017.