[AMRadio] AM Forum

Jim Wilhite w5jo at brightok.net
Tue Apr 3 09:42:55 EDT 2007

To you Pete and all, I posted Ted's site as a viable 
alternative to AM Fone.  On Ted's site, you will receive a 
respectful answer to any post made.  My comments were not 
intended to implicate or indite a particular person or 
group.  It was mentioned so if anyone West of the 
Mississippi would like an alternative, it is available.

The person to which I referred made several snide remarks to 
technical posts I made rather than be inclusive and disagree 
in a respectful manner.  In fact his comments is what first 
made me uneasy with the direction of the board to becoming 
more regionalized.  You, however, have always be respectful 
to all who post there.  This despite the fact that I have 
seen several really take you to task over your support of 
the ARRL.  You have also responded to inquiries I have made 
in in the past.  I suppose the difference may be that you 
were (are) in the manual business and recognize the value of 
respect for your peers, whereas some over there do not have 
the benefit of trying to please most people.


> Under Rules, it says: This is radio site dedicated to AM. 
> The reason most
> come here is to meet and exchange information about our 
> mode and hobby."
> Obviously, their is no requirement to have a amateur 
> license since many
> short wave listeners and general radio/electronic 
> experimenters are also
> interested in AM and in some of our technical discussions. 
> The technical
> discussion threads can vary all over the place.
> Although I can't place the person you referred to below, 
> it could be he's
> been a long time friend to many who responded to his 
> posts. Could be any
> number of reasons.
> Pete, wa2cwa

More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 18 Dec 2017.