|[AMRadio] Traffic Light interference|
quixote2 at ix.netcom.com
Mon Dec 3 15:32:23 EST 2007
>From: "D. Chester" <k4kyv at charter.net>
>Sent: Dec 3, 2007 2:09 PM
>To: amradio at mailman.qth.net
>This, plus the BPL thing, and the slowness to get anything done about power
>line interference, show that the FCC is the joke. Do AM'ers have any real
>reason to be so anal about an occasional voice peak exeeding 1500 watts on a
>questionable instrument ("ham radio quality" wattmeter) every now and again?
Nope. I don't think so.
>From the FCC agent's reaction to the complaint, I seriously doubt that he would
even know enough to be able to DETECT the occasional 1500 watt plus voice peak...
let alone give a rodent's rectum about it.
The fact that there is a sizable group of guys who have adopted a battle cry of
"REAL tubes have HANDLES", and we haven't heard of any massive issuances of NALs
to them says even more.
I should sweat going slightly over 1500 watts PEP occasionally while the SSB
contester down the road is running a 4CX15000 in the final? Gimme a break...
As long as my Bird 43 with an aftermarket peak reading board is happy, I'm not
gonna lose any sleep over the issue.
Mr. T., W9LBB
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 18 Oct 2017.