mswartzell at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 25 08:25:11 EST 2007
From: w9gt at comcast.net
Reply-To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
To: w2inr at amfone.net,Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Frequencies
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:55:28 +0000
Received: from mailman.qth.net ([18.104.22.168]) by
bay0-mc10-f14.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:56:31 -0800
Received: from mailman.qth.net (mailman.qth.net [127.0.0.1])by
mailman.qth.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3923E859D99;Thu, 25 Jan
2007 07:57:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net
[22.214.171.124])by mailman.qth.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
36965859C54for <amradio at mailman.qth.net>; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:57:30
Received: from rmailcenter91.comcast.net ([126.96.36.199])by
comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with SMTPid <20070125125528m1400jemg6e>;
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:55:28 +0000
Received: from [188.8.131.52] by rmailcenter91.comcast.net;Thu,
25 Jan 2007 12:55:28 +0000
>73, Jack, W9GT
>-------------- Original message --------------
>From: W2INR <w2inr at amfone.net>
> > An AMer get on the air after carefully checking the frequency .
> > are no QSO's within 10 kc's either side of the frequency he
> > calls CQ and gets a few responses. After about ten minutes
> > the QSO notice there is some SSB chatter on the upper side.
> > pulled within 2.5 KC of the AM QSO. ( more than likely because
> > a 2.5 filter). As soon as someone joins the SSB QSO they sit
> > complain about the AMers being too close. The AMers call it
> > and the road we have paved is already bumpy with no facts .
> > Does anyone come down to the AM QSO and try to work it out - -
- not too
> > often.
> > Does the offended station try to correct the problem by moving
up a bit
> > - - - -not too often.
> > Does either station try to correct the situation by moving,or
must we be
> > machismo and hold our ground. (BS)
> > So what does the SSB operator do? They sit there and complain
> > and do not enjoy their QSO and of course it is because of the
> > Of course this scenario is bias towards AM but it also occurs
> > way also. Neither is in the best interest of either party or
> > and perspective modes.
> > It's the lower class mentality of the operators. Why take the
> > when you can sling mud and then complain you got some on
> > will always be whiners, bullies, etc etc. They are the
> > We can take the high road or - - well you now the rest.
> > You can hear this highly professional operating techniques
every day on
> > the bands. It is not limited to just AM vs SSB but also SSB vs
> > AM vs AM. I never really got a grip on this as this is a hobby
> > should be fun . I guess disrupting QSO's and complaining for
> > fun to some. I really do not understand this but I have this to
> > Get rid of the chip on the shoulder
> > Get a life
> > Get on the air.
> > Get the VFO, BFO or your wrist fixed so you can move.
> > Treat others as you would be expected to be treated ( you reap
what you sow)
> > The world isn't perfect , neither is our hobby, bu we can
> > it better by being better people.
> > G/W2INR
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > AMRadio mailing list
> > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>AMRadio mailing list
>List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
>Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
>Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 17 Jan 2018.