|[AMRadio] AM vs SSB: Cost|
brett.gazdzinski at verizonbusiness.com
Tue May 1 20:14:59 EDT 2007
Not to put it down, I could have fun on ssb if there
was someone interesting to talk to on it, and maybe there is,
but not on 80 at night I guess.
Its efficient, but I have NO sense of pitch, and can not
tune the stuff in, it always sounds 'off'...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bry Carling
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 6:03 PM
> To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
> Subject: RE: [AMRadio] AM vs SSB: Cost
> He he - I love it - and I bet we are INFURIATING the anti-AMers
> who have taken to watching this list lately!
> > Why anyone would WANT to talk on ssb is beyond me,
> > a cell phone sounds better and costs less most times.
> > I can see why the hobby is shrinking, take a youngster
> > to listen to ssb quacking and they think voip is a lot cooler
> > and even texting is better.
> > SSB is a joke compared to voip and a web cam...
> > Brett
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 21 Oct 2017.