|[AMRadio] ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the "ignorant"|
ka1kaq at gmail.com
Thu Nov 8 10:55:59 EST 2007
On Nov 8, 2007 10:43 AM, KX5KW <ars.kx5kw at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think sentences 2 and 3 give evidence that sentence 1 is not true.
No.....say it isn't so! A League leader exaggerating, downplaying, or
otherwise twisting the facts to suit his needs? Can't be. (o:
> If it was true that AM is only legal because of "AM footnotes", it
> would certainly be a one step process to leave them out at some point
> in the future. That's probably what some people hope will happen.
Precisely why so many objected to AM being given an 'exception' in
their previous attempt.
> I believe the "mini uproar" showed him that it will not happen without
> resistance. Good that he noticed. :)
Yeah, 'mini' my.....footnote. If they get their way, they can
truthfully claim that they didn't move to shut down AM. Just stifled
it to a point that it's no longer enjoyable. With the expanded phone
band privileges (and less competition for more spectrum by fewer hams
as time goes on), the old 'inefficient/takes too much bandwidth'
argument holds a lot less water.
Was good to work you last weekend, Kent. Looking forward to more
excellent conditions ahead.
~ Todd, KA1KAQ
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 19 Oct 2017.