[AMRadio] Hallicrafters SX110


jeremy-ca km1h at jeremy.mv.com
Mon Nov 26 21:10:08 EST 2007


That S9er was a government issue update for some of the older Super Pros. 
Ive got one in a box someplace around here; want to try it in the SX-28 once 
I finish the overhaul. The 6BZ7, 6DJ8 and 6922 are even lower noise.

I used a 717A in the HQ-129x and it really woke up 20 & 15M; havent heard 
any 10M openings.

Carl
KM1H





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Donald Sanders" <w4bws at comcast.net>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" 
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Hallicrafters SX110


> And I had good luck with changing the front end on my SX99 to the S9er 
> using
> a 6BQ7. Really hopped up the front end.
>
> Healthfully yours,
>                          Don W4BWS
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
> <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 5:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Hallicrafters SX110
>
>
>> The only place the smaller tubes are better is in the front end. At IF,
> and
>> audio there is no difference.
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Lawrence Steeno" <lcbs at sbcglobal.net>
>> To: <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 4:47 PM
>> Subject: [AMRadio] Hallicrafters SX110
>>
>>
>> >I have a question--why would Hallicrafters use tubes from the 40's in a
>> >receiver made in the early 60's?? This seems kinda strange that they
> would
>> >use octal tubes in this unit when the 7 and 9 pin tubes were much
>> >better.------- Weren't they?-------
>> > Larry Steeno
>> > K9LWI
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
>> > AMRadio mailing list
>> > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
>> > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
>> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>> > Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>> > To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
>> > the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>> >
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
>> AMRadio mailing list
>> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
>> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
>> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
> 



More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 22 Oct 2017.