|[AMRadio] Rinaldo's bandwidth suggestion|
w1gud at tampabay.rr.com
Thu Nov 29 19:59:46 EST 2007
Too important to say ENOUGH ALREADY...
On Nov 29, 2007, at 7:50 PM, Larry Will wrote:
> I thought the moderator put this whole thread to BED.
> ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!
> At 05:47 PM 11/29/2007, you wrote:
>> Frankly I don't care which among ARRL officials passed
>> along a specific bandwidth number at the IARU
>> conference in Brazil. It should not have been uttered
>> without clearing it with U.S. licensees expecting to
>> support the Region 2 plan.
>> The concept of using specific numbers is wrong when
>> applied to the Amateur Service, and should now be
>> challenged and revised OUT of both the Region 1 and
>> Region 2 plans as inappropriate.
>> RamÃ³n, XE1KK, an IARU rep from Mexico, was so kind as
>> to return my call as I struggled to find anyone who
>> was at the table in Brazil. The U.S. delegates were
>> not returning phone calls, and I knew action need to
>> be taken quickly, so I stepped around League officials
>> and connected with several non-U.S. delegates.
>> RamÃ³n expressed dismay when I recounted a brief
>> history of failed ARRL attempts domestically to
>> achieve what they apparently had won at the IARU. A
>> failed bandwidth Petition withdrawn because of
>> opposition expressed to the FCC; an FCC Order against
>> the League's request to impose the force of law to
>> voluntary band plans, and the failure of a Petition to
>> the FCC to impose bandwidth limitations.
>> So when I asked him where the bandwidth specifications
>> came from in the IARU Region 2 plan, he said (rough
>> quote, notes not in front of me) "That was Paul
>> Rinaldo. He was concerned about people running wider
>> than that."
>> Another non-U.S. delegate confirmed the information
>> that RamÃ³n had volunteered, and the context in which
>> it was conveyed.
>> The context, which is hard to misconstrue twice, is
>> that Rinaldo presented the number without any
>> accompanying documentation as a basis it would be
>> appropriate in the plan being discussed in Brazil.
>> And, just like other modifications and adaptations
>> that make the Region 2 plan different than the earlier
>> plan in Region 1, there was and should have been
>> discussion by the club representing ALL U.S. licensees
>> (per the IARU charter), that there is a strong,
>> vibrant community of people in Region 2 who enjoy AM,
>> and whose operations should be placed in the main
>> table recognizing other activities and modes.
>> To that end, the League failed its constituents in
>> Brazil, and by not immediately amending that error,
>> continues to be of disservice.
>> More broadly, the ARRL, as the most influential policy
>> force among IARU clubs, has failed to push back on
>> needless specifications that will confuse rather than
>> complement a voluntary band plan we all wish to
>> It is my contention that the ARRL is actually behind
>> the bandwidth push for the reasons we've already
>> discussed in great detail.
>> Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you
>> with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ
>> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
>> AMRadio mailing list
>> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
>> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
>> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 13 Dec 2017.