|[AMRadio] Rinaldo's bandwidth suggestion|
w5jo at brightok.net
Thu Nov 29 22:33:57 EST 2007
Larry, as Brian said no one I know stopped the topic. As one of the
other moderators, I did not. I know you post pertinent topics from time
to time and contribute to the group in a positive way. I, too, hope you
To everyone else, I suggest that if any meaning outside the subject line
is added anywhere in the post, then change the subject line to reflect
that change so those of us who do not wish to read a topic will know.
In that way, one can delete topics they do not wish to read. If you
wish to post to a topic and comment about something else, please make it
two separate posts. Maybe that will help.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Will" <lhwill at verizon.net>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Rinaldo's bandwidth suggestion
>I thought the moderator put this whole thread to BED.
> ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!
> At 05:47 PM 11/29/2007, you wrote:
>>Frankly I don't care which among ARRL officials passed
>>along a specific bandwidth number at the IARU
>>conference in Brazil.
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 14 Dec 2017.