[AMRadio] Re: IARU bandplan


Bry Carling bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Sun Oct 14 15:06:28 EDT 2007


Thanks Steve,
I adapted this to my  non-ARRL situation and sent a smiliar letter
by e-mail to all of the same folks.

Great job!

> 
> iaru at iaru.org,leandror at bellsouth.net,w6rod at iaru.org,hp1dj at sinfo.net,9y4ned
> @tst
> t.net.tt,ve2ka at iaru.org,co2rp at jovenclub.cu,gudiel at comtelsa.com,9y4ned at tstt
> .net
> .tt,pt2adm at pobox.com,lu2ah at szama.com,LPrice at iaru.org,tellam at iaru.org,rlean
> dro@
> cantv.net,dsumner at arrl.org
> 
> Dear IARU Officer -
> 
> I see that the IARU has adopted, effective Jan 1 2008, a new "MF/HF band
> plan" for Region 2 that places restrictive limitations on transmitted
> signal 
> bandwidths and overlooks common modes and practices on the bands 160 -
> 10m.  
> 
> I am VERY much against such limits - tight regulation and restrictions
> like 
> these goes completely against the experimental and innovative aspects of
> ham 
> radio.  As a member of ARRL, which is the US member society of IARU, I
> urge you 
> to stop this plan from going into effect.  
> 
> I understand that it is a voluntary plan, but because it does not match 
> common practice on the bands today it will be ignored by thousands of
> operators.  
> Why make a plan that doesn't match present reality?  
> 
> But, voluntary or not, my position remains that plan is defective. 
> Bandplans 
> like this have a history of increasing the stress among amateurs with 
> arguments and finger-pointing.  And voluntary ones  tend to become ever
> more 
> "official" over time, so I think it is vital that we not err on the side
> of 
> restriction and limitation which could hinder our future communication
> options.
> 




More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 23 Oct 2017.