[AMRadio] Receivers


sbjohnston at aol.com sbjohnston at aol.com
Tue Sep 18 23:03:48 EDT 2007


The NC-300 was designed for AM, and the NC-303 for SSB.  I've only had 
a 303, but I understand the 300 is a much better AM receiver.

Steve WD8DAS

sbjohnston at aol.com
http://www.wd8das.net/
------------------------------------------------
Radio is your best entertainment value.
------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: w1eof at hamnutz.com <w1eof at hamnutz.com>
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 9:55 pm
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Receivers

While we're on the subject...


What's the difference (physical, electrical, or ephemeral) between the
NC-300 and NC-303?


I want to buy one as my main AM receiver, especially for use with my
Johnson 6N2 converter

with it'd weird IF frequency. Is one decidedly better than the other?


73,


Mark W1EOF


PS: Anyone got a 300 or 303 for sale or trade?

______________________________________________________________

Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net

AMRadio mailing list

List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html

List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html

Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net

To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with

the word unsubscribe in the message body.






________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - 
http://mail.aol.com


More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 10 Dec 2017.