[AMRadio] AM accomodated in IARU Region 1 Bandplan


Peter Markavage manualman at juno.com
Thu Dec 4 13:18:23 EST 2008


I sent this message to the e-mail link for this story on the ARRL's web
page and what also appeared in the weekly ARRL Letter. At this point, it
seems they have chosen not to make any revisions to their original news
report.
Pete, wa2cwa

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Markavage [mailto:manualman at juno.com]
Sent: Sun 11/30/2008 2:45 PM
To: awextra
Subject: IARU Region 1 Meeting News Item

Reference news item:
http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stories/2008/11/29/10474/?nc=1

The revised Region 1 band plan chart for 40 meters is shown, which was
defined on page 9 of the IARU Region 1's  final minutes. However, you
omitted the items on page 10 of the same minutes which further clarifies
the chart. The items include "Sideband Usage", "Definitions", and
"Notes". Without these items, the chart doesn't tell the whole story and
will, most likely, lead to confusion and concern.

Pete, WA2CWA

Pete--

Thank you for your note. Unfortunately, we can't reprint the final
plenary minutes. As such, we provided the link in the first sentence of
the article. This enables interested parties, such as yourself, to take a
closer look into it.

Have a good rest-of-Thanksgiving-weekend!

73,
S. Khrystyne Keane, K1SFA
ARRL News Editor
ARRL - the national association for Amateur Radio
860.594.0237
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------



On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:25:36 -0600 "D. Chester" <k4kyv at charter.net>
writes:
> Thanks, Paul, for digging out "the rest of the story".
> Interesting, that there is no mention of this in the ARRL Letter 
> news report 
> regarding the revised Region 1 band plan for 40m.  The wording of 
> their news 
> item leaves the distinct impression that the Plan recommends for all 
> phone 
> emissions to be limited to 2700 Hz.  This could be a simple 
> oversight in 
> reporting, which would demonstrate at the very least the writer's 
> dismissal 
> of the significance of the AM community in amateur radio, or it 
> could have 
> been a deliberate omission,  (sour grapes, maybe, or a subtle 
> expression of 
> unstated League policy supporting the Region 2 decision), 
> considering the 
> following:
> 
> 
> 
> Don k4kyv
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/amradio/attachments/20081204/dc8fb23c/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 17 Dec 2017.