|[AMRadio] Wanted: Receiver - New England|
ars.w5omr at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 01:23:39 EST 2008
JT Croteau wrote:
> AM 75M and 40M coverage is my primary interest at this time, I will
> NEVER be using the radio to tune in slopbucket nor CWer. SWL and 160M
> coverage would be nice as well but it will be a couple years before I
> have space for a 160M antenna.
> Hi-Fidelity is near the top of my must haves but not if it's
> results in a huge hit on receiver performance. However, I definitely
> don't want bottom of the barrel communications grade audio. I've been
> in some shacks where the audio fills the room and you can feel the
> audio down to your bones. I want to achieve this or as close as I can
> get within my budget.
Define "Hi-Fidelity"? Just because you can 'hear' the audio better,
makes it hi-fi?
Hell, bubba.. if that's all you want, get some 18" woofers and a pair of
tweeters, lash 'em up in a line-amp configuration, and take the 8-ohm
output from your rice-box and drive them big speakers. You'd be
surprised what a -big- speaker will do, on a radio that you're used to
listening to, that has a speaker about the size of a quarter
What about near-channel interference? Tighten up the selectivity? If
you think that 6kc is 'narrow' what's gonna happen when some ssb'er
snuggles up >2kc below ya? (and you -know- they will!)
Any good ol' Hallicrafter or Hammarlund receiver would do you good. The
HQ-170 ~ HQ-180 is a good receiver... SP-600, SX-73, National's are
good... see what they go for. Occasionally one shows up here...
Driving your AM Rig without a scope,
is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV)
73 = Best Regards,
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 22 Oct 2017.