|[AMRadio] Getting started|
Brett.Gazdzinski at verizon.net
Tue Feb 24 20:58:17 EST 2009
I liked the R390a best of all the receivers I had, from the operating
It was stable, accurite, had a good IF out for the scope, detector output,
You did not have to guess the frequency like most other vintage receivers.
It did tend to break clamps on the gears, but other than that, I never had
to do anything with it for 20 years of heavy use.
It was a bit noisy, but not bad, jumping between 160 and 10 meters was not
something you would do often on that receiver, even 160 to 40 was a workout.
Its big, heavy and rackmount, and now, expensive.
The NC300 or 303 was also good from what I remember, although not my idea of
a nice looking radio.
I thought the 75A4 was very poor on AM, but looked great.
I always thought something like a 75S1 could make a good AM receiver with
An sx101 might be good, I had a Drake R4c, to narrow for AM, if people were
off frequency, you could not hear them at all....and people seem to be off
frequency on AM a LOT!
I sold the R390a and built my own receiver, which on 160, 80 and 40 meters
works much better than the R390a.
A good AM receiver is really very simple, unless you want it to do all
For 160, 80 and 40 meters, you do not need any sort of RF amp stage, a
simple high Q link coupled tuned input works great, a LO and mixer, 2 stages
of IF amplifcation, a hifi detector, some AGC, an S meter amp, and a 455KHz
xtal osc for a bfo.
I used kiwa filters, which work like Collins mechanical filters, and a
digital freq counter with a 455 KHz offset that reads the actual frequency.
So its small, light, accurite,stable, low noise, hifi.
You can also do tricks so when you change bands, the receiver is tuned to
1880, 3880, and 7290.
So far, I have not found a receiver that sounds better on just AM, no sync
detector or anything fancy, but its better than the sdr-iq was, or the icom
pro3, r390a, etc.
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 18 Oct 2017.