|[AMRadio] AMRadio Digest, Vol 69, Issue 22|
manualman at juno.com
Wed Oct 28 12:56:13 EDT 2009
If I remember correctly, R(readability), S(strength), T(tone) was
designed for CW reporting. Obviously, for phone operations, there is no
"T" designator in the reporting. That really was my only point. No need
to generate a modified PDF for me. I've generated a number of custom logs
for myself for HF, VHF, and some localized contesting which required
different column headers. I've also done some custom log books for
several clubs that included watermarking the club call, name, or logo on
each sheet. I've also done some customized 50's and 60's style log books
that watermarked (roughly a 60% gray shade) a manufacturer's name
diagonally across each page.
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:53:25 -0400 sbjohnston at aol.com writes:
> Pete, wa2cwa
> > Wouldn't it be more appropriate for today's operations if, instead
> > "RST", "Report" is used
> Not sure why "RST" would not be appropriate to "today's operations"
> - I
> use the RS(T) system of reporting all the time. The ARRL log says
> "Report", but I preferred "RST". I wanted to make a log exactly the
> way I like it.
> Don't look a gift log in the mouth. Do you want your money back?
> Seriously, "RST" could be "Rpt" or"Report" or whatever you'd like.
> case you don't have Acrobat to edit the .pdf I can send you a new
> with the change.
> Steve WD8DAS
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 18 Oct 2017.