|[AMRadio] Retro 75|
Brett.Gazdzinski at verizon.net
Thu Apr 8 20:50:48 EDT 2010
The wilderness radio sierra does 160 to 10, has a better receiver, 5 watts
out, variable bandwidth, a vfo, a case, and costs about $200.00 I think.
So I think a 10 meter AM rig could be built without a lot more expense.
I find there are plenty of nice interesting people to talk to on AM, but not
during prime time.
80 and 40 meters weekend mornings are best for me.
----- Original Message -----
From: "LEE BAHR" <pulsarxp at embarqmail.com>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Retro 75
>I have a Retro 75 and it is great. I also don't represent Dave Benson the
> designer. That said I think Dave decided to design a simple fun radio to
> build which is very usable at a very attractive price. As I see it,
> a rig like this on 10 meters will require more parts, more stability, and
> much more expensive crystals, plus a more costly output transistor. The
> aligning would be more involved too. This design was for a nostalgic
> to the past with an inexpensive price. I doubt you will see a ten meter
> version ever produced. Maybe if the 80 meter kit took off, you might see
> one for 160 meters or even 40 meters but that would be it. You can't take
> months designing something, kitting it and then only sell 50 kits at
> Understand too, there is a great financial stress on anyone coming up with
> the needed operating crystals at an affordable price. You can't supply a
> $30.00 crystal in a $65.00 kit. It's got to be in the $3.00 range. How
> guys want to have 2000 made for $2.00 each and sell them for $3.00? It
> would take a club with a great designer with everyone doing all the work
> free and then charging a near cost price for the kit to sell an AM rig for
> 10 meters at around $80 with no cabinet included. (I used a very nice Ten
> Tec cabinet for around $6.00 for this project).
> I also, just built, a Ft Tuthill 80 CW transceiver offered by the
> QRP group. They kitted the transceiver for $50.00 and it is VFO
> with around a plus 50 khz tuning range. This too is a really nice nice
> It works very nicely and is very stable. (I made a great looking home
> case for this radio out of PC board material so the radio fits into the
> like a glove) I think a VFO approach to 10 meters would be better then
> using a costly crystal on ten meters. Of course, at this frequency, it
> would take some effort producing a stable oscillator.
> "Through hole" parts are also becoming obsolete. Spending time designing
> transceiver only to find out parts in your design are now no longer
> available is not too exciting for a designer. How many guys out there per
> centage wise, want to build something with 150 surface mount parts? Then
> too, how many designers want to "help" guys who have built this surface
> mount wonder when after it is turned on for the first time and it doesn't
> The other problem I see is as the price increases, the demand falls off.
> think many of todays hams would prefer a SSB radio over an AM or FM radio.
> You start getting into $150.00 for radio and cabinet and many are going to
> start questioning, "Do I want to spend $150 for a one band radio? The
> you add to the project the more considerations need to be addressed. The
> considerations are not all electrical but the social ones become more
> I have been licensed since 1953. I love to build and restore radios. I
> love boat anchors and also QRP as I can restore stuff and build stuff. I
> rarely operate because I have very little in common with most hams today
> don't belong to any "group" operating on one frequency. When I do operate
> it is usually on CW or talking to a close friend. I own a KW broadcast
> transmitter, KW-1 all the way down to an Ameco AC-1 clone and many QRP
> Just my thoughts.
> Lee, w0vt
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 19 Oct 2017.