[AMRadio] AM Broadcast Quality


Bry Carling bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Mon Dec 16 21:56:36 EST 2013


I don't see what is so objectionable about a 8 or 10kHz wide signal if it isn't bothering anyone else. 

Bry Carling
http://af4k.com
Sent with my iPhone 6


> On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:06 PM, "W. Harris" <nbcblue at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> No more band width than necessary for the particular mode of operation. No reason for an AM signal on the ham bands to be 10khz wide just for "broadcast quality".
> 
> Bill - K5MIL
> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:50:04 -0500
>> From: "Bernie  Doran" <qedconsultants at embarqmail.com>
>> To: "W. Harris" <nbcblue at hotmail.com>,    <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
>> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM Broadcast Quality
>> Message-ID: <25F56CE78EB84D9E8C71853D599787A7 at berniePC>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>>    reply-type=original
>> 
>> Who said the object was using no more bandwidth than necessary?  so all CW I 
>> guess. Bernie
> 
>                         
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Archives: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/amradio/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 23 Nov 2017.