|[AMRadio] BC-610 on 160|
k4kyv at charter.net
Tue Nov 5 14:53:12 EST 2013
From: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo at gmail.com>
One of the articles in ER on the BC610 that appeared over the years said
that the 610 on 160, has a poorly suppressed second harmonic if you run the
rig directly into a feedline to an antenna. According to the article (sorry
I usually only remember what something said; not author and issue dates)
it's important to run the rig into some kind
of low pass network before the feedline on 160
That's probably true for any link-coupled rig, not particularly the BC-610.
My first novice rig, 30 watts to a single 807 had a coupling link directly
to 75-ohm twin lead to an 80m dipole. When I first got on the air with it I
got a pink slip or OO report for 2nd harmonic right away. I ended up
building a low-pass filter and putting it in the line. The problem is that
with an untuned link directly to a flat feed line, the coupling has to be
very tight to get sufficient loading, and that doesn't have a lot of
harmonic suppression. If the link is resonated with a capacitor you get
better harmonic suppression. Better still, use an antenna tuner. I have
never received a harmonic report using a link coupled tuner to resonant
I don't think the 610 would be any worse than any other rig of its type.
There is sufficient capacitance in the tank circuit to make for acceptable
Q in the tuned circuit. Whoever wrote the ER article probably just connected
coax directly to the PA output link and fed a half wave dipole or
quarter-wave Marconi with it, with no other tuned circuitry between the
transmitter and antenna. Resonating the link with a variable capacitor
allows for looser coupling as well as providing additional selectivity to
further reduce the 2nd harmonic.
If the link coupled final is push-pull, not single ended like the one in the
610, the 2nd and other even harmonics are inherently suppressed (or in the
real world, greatly reduced).
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 19 Feb 2018.