[AMRadio] Monitoring Modulation Accurately

Bry Carling bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Fri Nov 15 13:37:57 EST 2013

This is not true according to many things I have read. Talk power means something unless you are a plate mod only purist.
Personally, I like reduced carrier AM a lot and it has never sound distorted to me. Not as much band blanking in between words or during long pauses but otherwise just great punching AM.

Bry Carling

> On Nov 15, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo at gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with some of this but not all of it.  Peak power may be
> everything if you are a slopbucketeer, but in ham AM, it's a bogus
> power indicator--it's difficult to measure accurately, and gives a
> false idea of your transmitting effectiveness because AM has a complex
> waveform over time and frequency spectrum.   For AM I measure dead
> carrier into a 50 ohm pure resistance with a Bird 43 and thermocouple
> RF amp meter (you can also use a VTVM with a HP RF probe tapped off
> the dummy load) and then under modulation let the chips fall where
> they may, only making sure the negatives don't clip the carrier.
> Others may obsess about peak power or PEP but I think it's a waste of
> time.
> Other reasons why obsessing over high positive peaks and peak power
> are inadvisable:  If you go wildly asymmetric on the positives, you
> may be technically clean if you limit negative to 95%, but you'll
> still distort in a lot of receivers not equipped with sophisticated
> detectors.   Extremely asymmetric AM has been shown to suffer more
> from selective fading.   And, it doesn't really do anything for
> getting through on the other end.  Instead, what really matters and
> should be pursued as a goal, (if the operator cares about any of this)
> is _high average_ audio power.  This is achieved with a combination of
> compression and peak limiting.
> The next time I work an AM op and he tells me his PEP I'm going to
> tell him I'm only interested in PEP when I'm going to Pep Boys for car
> parts hi.
> The one useful thing about the positive and negative peak flashers on
> a monitor is that if you see the positive flashing a lot more that the
> negative, you know you need to flip the phase on the audio.
> 73
> Rob
> K5UJ
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:17 AM, W2XJ <w2xj at w2xj.net> wrote:
>> With proper processing it should not be a problem. I always trust a scope before a mod monitor. Properly clipped negative peaks are easy to see and the absolute value of positives are not important. In broadcast it is common practice to modulate as much positives as the TX can take and in amateur operation a peak power measurement is the only thing that really counts.
>> Sent from my iPad
>>> On Nov 15, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Steve WA1QIX <wa1qix at piesky.com> wrote:
>>> Using a scope to monitor your modulation gives you a good indication of the shape of your waveform, but the human eye is just not fast enough to catch the peaks nor can you really determine accurately your actual percentage of modulation unless you are using a very modern peak storing scope.
>> Sent from my iPad
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
>> AMRadio mailing list
>> Archives: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/amradio/
>> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
>> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
>> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
>> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 21 Jan 2018.