|[AMRadio] Antenna issues.|
rbethman at comcast.net
Tue Jul 8 10:53:10 EDT 2014
It appears to be more a regional issue.
I don't have to hang out much of anything for an antenna here on the
East coast - Virginia, and I can go from band to band and here activity.
You are in an RF hole being tucked away just a bit from the mountains.
That has to be a big issue for you to overcome.
Plus you have antenna restrictions to boot.
The XYL and I already know pretty well where we are going to move when
we retire. We are going back home to Georgia. I never had any issues
down there with hearing and/or talking to folks.
Didn't need anything fancy either!
Bob - N0DGN
On 7/8/2014 10:40 AM, K5MYJ wrote:
> In the late 60's, early 70's I live in an apartment where a HF antenna
> was not possible. But I was able to work 2M AM on a coaxial dipole
> hung from the second floor rain gutter. It worked well for local
> 2M AM is now HISTORY and it seems most 2M FM activity is on the
> What does a modern ham start with? The cheapest solution is a 2M FM
> There are no HF transceivers (that I know of) available under $500.
> In THE OLD DAYS we would start with a GC receiver and a HB
> transmitter. We learned our CW that way. As time went on we would
> upgrade the receiver and the transmitter as funds would allow.
> That method of getting started does not seem possible anymore for
> I started with S-38 ( the original with a REAL BFO) and a HB 6AG7/807
> transmitter from a mid 50's handbook.
> Is HF radio in decline? I don't see much HF activity here in Seattle
> except on contest days. And I use the Reverse Beacons to monitor CW
> activity. But they don't work well for AM or SSB.
> I'm not the only one in this area that does not see much activity. And
> I do have some decent receivers.
> Bob Macklin
> Seattle, Wa.
> "Real Radios Glow In The Dark"
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 17 Feb 2018.