macklinbob at gmail.com
Fri Oct 24 12:43:08 EDT 2014
Since most AM operators only use a few frequencies I don't see a problem
using a ART-13.
Checking ART-13 prices on eBay they seem to sell for less than either a
DX-100 or a Viking.
And they can put out much more power.
I have no problems with either a DX-100 or a Viking other than their price.
I just wish it was practical to make your own DX-100/Viking class
transmitter today. But parts that were available 40 years ago are not
readily available today.
----- Original Message -----
From: "L L bahr " <pulsarxp at embarqmail.com>
To: <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ART-13?
> What an ignorant remark! The DX-100 was a masterpiece. I am not knocking
> the ART-13, but for ham use the DX-100 was one of the most successful ham
> transmitters ever produced. It probably outsold every other ham
> transmitter in it's class. Today it is still prized by many. When new it
> sold for around $190 and has extremely well built transformers. 6146
> finals in it are almost an industry standard. A DX-100 is much more usable
> on ham bands then an ART-13. Put the ART in a museum or use it as a parts
> Lee, w0vt
> "The DX-100 and an ART-13 are not comparable. That's like trying to
> compare a Yugo to a Top of the line Mercedes."
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Archives: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/amradio/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 20 Nov 2017.