|[AMRadio] Cart and horse, chicken and egg, etc.|
rsq14adam1 at hotmail.com
Thu Oct 15 17:57:17 EDT 2015
Agree that it was an economic decision. I vaguely remember the explanation given to make QST larger size was a stated plus, apparently at the time, the cost of the paper was cheaper in the larger size. I remember thinking that, in high school, we used to read QST in study hall because it fit nicely inside a textbook and wondering how those there at the time were going to do it.
> To: amradio at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:23:13 -0400
> From: manualman at juno.com
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cart and horse, chicken and egg, etc.
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:46:00 -0500 "Donald Chester" <k4kyv at charter.net>
> >As for the physical size, nearly all other magazines went to that size
> about the same time QST did. I have never heard any real explanation
> why, or what was supposed to be the advantage of the >larger size. Maybe
> the Post Office gave a better bulk rate to the standard size.
> *** I believe you are correct. USPS made changes to their bulk magazine
> size rates plus paper manufacturers were increasing costs for that size
> type of paper, and I believe some of the newer printing machines weren't
> designed and/or additional cost setup for the mass printing of the
> smaller paper size. It was an economical descision.
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Archives: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/amradio/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to rsq14adam1 at hotmail.com
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 17 Nov 2017.