|[AMRadio] FAA Reauthorization Act H.R. 636, short tower regulation|
oldrotorheadsarge at outlook.com
Sat Jul 23 20:12:49 EDT 2016
This one is stuck directly next to a long row of houses, and I am sure those folks don't want the dang thing there no matter how it looks.
Regards, Bob Bethman
From: AMRadio [mailto:amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Donald Chester
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 8:10 PM
To: 'AM Radio List' <AMradio at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FAA Reauthorization Act H.R. 636, short tower regulation
> All due consideration is also that cellphone towers/poles have a large
> number of them NOW disguised as TREES.
> This has been done in an attempt to appease the public so that they
> aren't such an eyesore in neighborhoods.
> There is one just up the road from me. Although it has a "tree
> the darn thing is still an eyesore.
> Regards, Bob Bethman
The ones who complain the loudest about those 'unsightly' cell phone towers probably walk (or drive) round all day with a mobile phone glued to their ear or their eyes glued to a smartphone screen.
More information about the AMRadio mailing list
This page last updated 23 Jan 2018.