[AMRadio] Landline vs cell

Rob Atkinson ranchorobbo at gmail.com
Mon Jul 25 19:32:55 EDT 2016

I refuse to have a cell phone conversation that lasts longer than a
minute or two.  To me it is a tool to transmit information like "I'll
meet you at two at the supermarket."  not much more than that.  Any
real phone call for me has to be on a land line.

Steve, I've heard those cable telephones with the battery backups
didn't make it long during the Sandy power outage.  Folks who still
had POTS were the only ones with phone service.



On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Steve WA1QIX <wa1qix at piesky.com> wrote:
> I still have a landline here, but it costs over $100/month because I want
> call forwarding and caller ID (which are both expensive).
> Have been considering dropping it, but I do like the reliability.
> However, recently I got a "cable" (Comcast) delivered phone - converted a
> 2nd land line I had over to the Comcast phone service - kept the same
> number, etc.  THAT service is of VERY high quality - better than the land
> line, in fact.  It's DEAD silent (no hum, etc) the audio is clean and the
> frequency response is quite reasonable.  And it's significantly less
> expensive.
> Could be an option, I suppose.  During a power outage, you would have to
> keep your local cable interface powered up, or obviously your phones would
> die.  The box I got has a battery which will keep it alive for some amount
> of time (don't know how long).

More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 18 Feb 2018.