[AMRadio] New analog phone bandwidth petition

Rob Atkinson ranchorobbo at gmail.com
Sun May 15 20:38:25 EDT 2016

Charlie, the ARRL has nothing to do with it.  It's a waste of time to
comment to them.  This thing is before the FCC.  You have to comment
to the FCC if you want any voice or vote.



On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:59 PM, CL in NC via AMRadio
<amradio at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
> Well, I am pretty sure after reviewing the proposal of this semantic conscious ham in the midwest,  when I write my ARRL representatives about my concern on this new proposal, I will: 1- Not get a reply; 2- Get a reply that touts the state of the art and how we should look to move ahead.; 3- Get a reply that says the ARRL is always observant and protective of out spectrum rights.  Sometimes the teats and boar analogy applies when trying to motivate our only hobby wide national spokesmen.

More information about the AMRadio mailing list

This page last updated 19 Feb 2018.